Key result
Severe mobility limitation (unable to walk) was associated with a higher risk of 2-year heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause mortality compared to independent walking (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.34-2.20).
Why the study?
Mobility limitation is prevalent in patients with HF, but the dose-response relationship between its severity and adverse outcomes remains unquantified.
Does the severity of mobility limitation at discharge predict the 2-year risk of heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients?
Cohort (n=2,103)
Yes
Does the severity of mobility limitation at discharge predict the 2-year risk of heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.71 (95% CI 1.34–2.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 84.8% vs 24.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
There is a strong, graded association between the severity of mobility limitation at discharge and the 2-year risk of mortality or heart failure rehospitalization in hospitalized HF patients, which can aid in refined risk stratification.
Graded mobility limitation at HF discharge may aid risk stratification; extends observational data but leaves open whether targeting mobility improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Mobility limitation is prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the dose-response relationship between its severity and adverse outcomes remains unquantified. METHODS: We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of two prospective Japanese cohort studies, including 2103 hospitalised patients with HF with no exclusion criteria. Mobility limitation at discharge was categorised into four levels: category I (independent outdoor walking), category II (indoor independence but requiring outdoor assistance), category III (requiring indoor assistance) and category IV (unable to walk). The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite of HF rehospitalisation or all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses accounted for age, sex, comorbidities, biomarkers and medications. RESULTS: Among 2820.7 person-years of follow-up, 998 composite outcomes occurred. Incidence rates per 100 person-years for the primary outcome increased with mobility limitation severity: 24.9 (category I), 47.0 (II), 59.3 (III) and 84.8 (IV) (p for trend <0.001). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) using category I as reference were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.45) for II, 1.39 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.73) for III and 1.71 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.20) for IV. While the graded association was clear for mortality, it was less evident for HF rehospitalisation alone, likely reflecting competing mortality risks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a strong and graded association between mobility limitation severity and adverse outcomes in HF, suggesting its utility for refined risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwatsu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=2,103). Mobility limitation severity vs. Category I (independent outdoor walking) was evaluated on 2-year composite of HF rehospitalisation or all-cause mortality (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.20, p=<0.001). Severe mobility limitation (unable to walk) was associated with a higher risk of 2-year heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause mortality compared to independent walking (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.34-2.20).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: