Randomized trial develops a comfort grading system for indoor quality in libraries, indicating a practical evaluation method.
Traditional evaluation of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) relies on static models that overlook user comfort and lack unified grading standards. Based on on-site measurements and subjective surveys conducted in a university library in Guangzhou across summer, transitional, and winter seasons, this study develops and validates a seasonally adaptive evaluation framework. A key innovation is the establishment of a five-level comfort grading system (from excellent to very poor) built upon a novel index, the predicted mean vote index (PMVi). The PMVi applies Weber/Fechner's law to normalize thermal, air quality, acoustic, and lighting indicators into a single variable, and its validity is confirmed through user evaluations. Importantly, the analytic hierarchy process revealed seasonal shifts in occupants’ environmental preferences: thermal conditions dominate in summer (weight = 0.45), while acoustic factors become most influential during transitional (0.37) and winter (0.40) periods. Ultimately, this study establishes an integrated evaluation model; the proposed integrated evaluation model, combining objective PMVi with dynamic seasonal weightings, aligns closely with occupants’ perceived comfort. This framework provides a practical and unified approach for dynamic IEQ evaluation and regulation in library environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: