Key result
Pentaspline PFA catheter linked to ~5% transient AKI risk from hemolysis versus other PFA designs.
Why the study?
Increasing evidence suggests an association between pulsed field ablation and intravascular hemolysis and acute kidney injury, but the extent across different catheter designs remains poorly characterized.
Does the type of pulsed field ablation catheter influence the extent of hemolysis, acute kidney injury, and myocardial injury in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Cohort (n=239)
No
Does the type of pulsed field ablation catheter influence the extent of hemolysis, acute kidney injury, and myocardial injury in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Effect estimate: 4.9% vs 0.0%
Absolute Event Rate: 4.9% vs 0%
p-value: p=0.020
May warrant renal monitoring after pentaspline PFA; leaves open whether catheter design affects outcomes in randomized AF ablation trials.
INTRODUCTION: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy modality for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although PFA has demonstrated an excellent overall safety profile, increasing evidence suggests an association with intravascular hemolysis, and acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the extent of hemolysis across different PFA catheters remains poorly characterized and warrants further investigation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 239 patients undergoing AF ablation using the pentaspline (n = 107), balloon-in-basket (n = 71), or lattice-tip (n = 61) catheter. Laboratory markers of hemolysis, myocardial injury, renal function and haemoglobin were collected pre- and 24 h post-procedure. RESULTS: Significant haptoglobin depletion was observed exclusively with pentaspline, [pre 99.8 mg/dL (70.2-122) vs. post 55.7 mg/dL (23.2-91.8); p < 0.001] Reductions with the lattice-tip (p = 0.074) and the balloon-in-basket (p = 0.201) catheter did not reach statistical significance. AKI was only observed with the pentaspline catheter (pentaspline: 4.9%; balloon-in-basket: 0.0%; lattice tip: 0.0%; p = 0.020).Myocardial markers increased across all groups, but significantly higher in pentaspline and balloon-in-basket (p = n.s.) vs lattice-tip (p < 0.001 vs pentaspline, p < 0.001 vs ballon in basket). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort, contemporary PFA systems appear safe but catheter design influences the extent of hemolysis, AKI, and myocardial injury. The pentaspline catheter was associated with the greatest hemolytic effect and higher transient AKI, without clinically relevant reductions in hemoglobin or persistent renal impairment. Higher levels of myocardial injury in the pentaspline and balloon-in-basket groups correspond to the larger lesion footprints of these devices.Word counting abstract: 234.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocchetti et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=239). Pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter vs. Balloon-in-basket and lattice-tip pulsed field ablation catheters was evaluated on Acute kidney injury (AKI) (4.9% vs 0.0%, p=0.020). The pentaspline PFA catheter was associated with significant haptoglobin depletion and a 4.9% incidence of transient acute kidney injury, whereas balloon-in-basket and lattice-tip catheters showed no significant hemolysis or AKI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: