Artificial intelligence (AI) has shifted rapidly from speculative innovation to active policy concern in U.S. education, yet nationally representative evidence on teachers’ capacity and well-being remains limited. Using U.S. data from TALIS 2024 and design-based linear models, this quantitative study examines how AI-focused professional development (PD), beliefs, perceived barriers, and AI use intensity relate to teachers’ instructional fulfillment and occupational well-being. About 40% of teachers reported AI PD participation and AI use. Positive beliefs predicted higher satisfaction and well-being but also greater stress, whereas critical beliefs predicted lower satisfaction yet higher self-efficacy. Perceived barriers to AI use were associated with lower well-being. Results highlight AI policy as workforce policy, emphasizing high-quality PD, collaboration, and reduced time costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei Jiang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: