A Corpus-Based Pragmatic Study of the Formulation of Definitions and Legal Rulings in Sharia and Law College Curricula at Saudi Universities

Sharia and Law colleges in Saudi universities provide a distinctive educational setting in which classical Islamic jurisprudential discourse and contemporary statutory legal discourse coexist within the same curriculum. Despite this shared institutional context, the pragmatic characteristics of these coexisting normative genres remain largely unexplored from a corpus-based perspective. This study examines how genre differences influence the linguistic formulation of legal definitions and religious rulings across four officially prescribed texts: two classical Hanbali works—Rawḍat al-Nāẓir by Ibn Qudāma and Al-Rawḍ al-Murbiʿ by al-Buhūtī—and two contemporary Saudi statutes—the Civil Transactions Law and the Law of Criminal Procedure. A purpose-built corpus of approximately 480,000 words was analysed using a corpus-assisted discourse analysis design integrating quantitative frequency and keyword analysis with systematic manual pragmatic coding within a triangulated theoretical framework. The findings show that differences in disciplinary genre are systematically reflected in distinct pragmatic profiles. Rawḍat al-Nāẓir is characterised by assertive-definitional speech acts and methodological deontic expressions, whereas Al-Rawḍ al-Murbiʿ is dominated by directive speech acts associated with applied legal rulings. The statutory texts employ standardised legislative constructions, including negative-exceptive formulations, formal prohibition markers, and institution-specific obligation structures. The Civil Transactions Law further exhibits a hybrid pragmatic register through the incorporation of classical jurisprudential maxims into enacted statutory provisions. Based on the systematic literature review undertaken for this study, the findings provide what is, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the first corpus-based pragmatic comparison of these coexisting curricular genres. The study thereby contributes to Arabic legal linguistics, corpus pragmatics, and the linguistic analysis of legal education, while offering empirically grounded insights for curriculum development in Sharia and Law programmes.