Examines functional difficulties related to cognitive concerns in adults, suggesting higher risks for certain groups.
BackgroundExperiencing subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) marks a potential risk stage for Alzheimer's disease.ObjectiveThis study examined sex and racial/ethnic patterns in the prevalence of functional difficulties among U.S. adults with SCC.MethodsData for 32,105 adults aged ≥45 years who experienced SCC in the past year were sourced from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 2015-2022. Individuals reporting SCC-related functional difficulties in daily or social life activities always/usually/sometimes (versus rarely/never) in the past year were considered having each of the functional difficulties. Weighted binomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association of sex (male or female) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], Hispanic, or non-Hispanic Other [NHO]) with SCC-related daily and social life difficulties, adjusting for all covariates.ResultsOverall, a decreasing trend in SCC-related functional difficulties was observed in both sexes, while female adults had higher prevalence. Trends in these functional difficulties varied by race/ethnicity, with NHW adults exhibiting the most stable and lowest prevalence. Female adults had significantly higher odds of experiencing SCC-related daily life (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15, 1.41) and social life difficulties (AOR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.24) than male adults. NHB, Hispanic, and NHO groups had higher odds of experiencing SCC-related daily and social life difficulties compared to NHW participants.ConclusionsFemale and racial/ethnic minority individuals experienced higher levels of SCC-related functional difficulties. Public health interventions are warranted to alleviate such challenges for vulnerable populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: