Key result
Bachmann's bundle pacing significantly reduced interatrial mechanical delay (-3 vs 21 ms) and improved left ventricular performance compared to right atrial-sensed pacing in CRT patients.
Why the study?
Does Bachmann's bundle pacing improve atrial synchrony and left ventricular performance compared to right atrial appendage pacing or RA-sensed pacing in patients with pacemakers or CRT?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does Bachmann's bundle pacing improve atrial synchrony and left ventricular performance compared to right atrial appendage pacing or RA-sensed pacing in patients with pacemakers or CRT?
Bachmann's bundle pacing preserves atrial synchrony and improves left ventricular performance compared to traditional right atrial appendage pacing, potentially maximizing the hemodynamic benefits of CRT.
BB pacing may optimize CRT hemodynamics via restored atrial synchrony; hypothesis-generating, larger trials needed before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Right atrial (RA) appendage (RAA) pacing is reported to impair hemodynamic benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) through a considerable delay of left atrial (LA) contraction, which compromises appropriate balance of atrioventricular (AV) and left ventricular (LV) synchrony. Potential usefulness of Bachmann's bundle (BB) pacing to solve the problem remains to be confirmed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial synchrony and LV performance was investigated by echocardiography in 25 patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with preserved AV conduction and LV function (Group I), and 15 patients receiving CRT (Group II). In Group I, RAA pacing (AAI mode, n=10) increased P-wave duration (PWD) and RA-to-LA contraction delay (IAMD) compared with sinus rhythm (132±14 and 35±12 ms vs. 108±16 and 13±13 ms, P<0.001). The delayed LA contraction was associated with early interruption of LV filling, leading to an impairment of LV performance (Tei index: 0.43±0.12 vs. 0.34±0.09, P<0.01). BB pacing (AAI, n=15) did not cause such undesirable effects. In Group II, RA (BB)-paced biventricular pacing (DDD) reduced PWD and IAMD compared with RA-sensed biventricular pacing (VDD) (102±14 and -3±13 ms vs. 117±10 and 21±18 ms, P<0.001). This restoration of atrial synchrony was associated with significant improvement of LV performance (Tei index: 0.56±0.18 vs. 0.62±0.16, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BB pacing preserves atrial synchrony, and might be more favorable than RAA pacing for maximizing hemodynamic efficacy of CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=40). Bachmann's bundle pacing vs. Right atrial-sensed biventricular pacing (VDD) was evaluated on Interatrial mechanical delay (IAMD) (p=<0.001). Bachmann's bundle pacing significantly reduced interatrial mechanical delay (-3 vs 21 ms) and improved left ventricular performance compared to right atrial-sensed pacing in CRT patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: