Key result
Bachmann bundle pacing cuts atrial activation time ~15% vs RAA pacing in pigs, improving mechanical function.
Why the study?
Right atrial appendage pacing impairs atrioventricular coupling, and while Bachmann bundle pacing restores interatrial conduction delay, its acute hemodynamic impact remains unclear.
Does Bachmann bundle pacing improve atrial activation and hemodynamics compared to right atrial appendage pacing in a porcine model?
Does Bachmann bundle pacing improve atrial activation and hemodynamics compared to right atrial appendage pacing in a porcine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 142.8% vs 167.2%
p-value: p=0.006
In a porcine model, Bachmann bundle pacing shortens atrial activation and improves immediate mechanical performance compared to conventional right atrial appendage pacing.
BB pacing improves acute hemodynamics versus RAA in pigs; leaves open translation to human outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing impairs atrioventricular (AV) coupling and is associated with atrial fibrillation and adverse outcomes. Bachmann bundle (BB) pacing restores the interatrial conduction delay, but its acute hemodynamic impact remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To characterize atrial activation and immediate hemodynamic effects of BB versus RAA pacing in a porcine model under AV-synchronized and non-synchronized conditions. METHODS: Six Landrace pigs underwent high-density biatrial electroanatomical mapping and invasive pressure monitoring of left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), and femoral artery. A sequential activation- and pace-mapping workflow was used to identify the BB area. Total atrial activation times and P-wave characteristics were compared during BB and RAA pacing. Hemodynamic responses were assessed during non-AV-synchronized pacing in all pigs and during AV-sequential pacing with His bundle active-fixation lead capture in three pigs. RESULTS: BB pacing reproduced sinus P-wave duration and morphology (72.6±9.1 vs 73.0±8.6ms), whereas RAA pacing significantly prolonged P-wave duration (106.2±17.5ms; P=0.001). Total atrial activation time was shorter with BB versus RAA pacing (142.8±18.5ms vs 167.2±25.6ms; P=0.006), with disappearance of slow conduction zones seen during RAA pacing. Without AV-synchronization, BB pacing increased mean LV, RV, femoral pressures and LV dP/dT versus RAA pacing and baseline, without raising LA pressure. Under AV-sequential pacing, BB pacing modestly reduced intracardiac pressures relative to RAA pacing while preserving higher LV contractility versus baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In this porcine model, BB pacing shortens atrial activation and confers immediate improved mechanical performance over conventional RAA pacing, supporting BB as a physiological atrial pacing target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramírez et al. (2026) studied Porcine model (n=6). Bachmann bundle pacing vs. Right atrial appendage pacing was evaluated on Total atrial activation time (p=0.006). In a porcine model, Bachmann bundle pacing shortened total atrial activation time compared to right atrial appendage pacing (142.8 vs 167.2 ms; P=0.006) and improved immediate mechanical performance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: