Key result
In healthy 40-year-old men, the upper 95% prediction bands for arterial stiffness were approximately 60 mmHg for peripheral pulse pressure, 40 mmHg for central pulse pressure, 90% for peripheral augmentation index, and 30% for central augmentation index, with adjustments needed for age and sex.
Why the study?
What are the normal reference values for arterial stiffness indexes measured by the SphygmoCor device in healthy white Europeans?
Cross-Sectional (n=534)
Yes
What are the normal reference values for arterial stiffness indexes measured by the SphygmoCor device in healthy white Europeans?
This study establishes age- and sex-specific reference values for arterial stiffness indexes measured by the SphygmoCor device in healthy white Europeans, providing operational thresholds for clinical practice.
Preliminary thresholds may aid interpretation of arterial stiffness indexes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Measurement of blood pressure together with applanation tonometry at the radial artery allows the reproducible assessment of various indexes of arterial stiffness, including the peripheral (PPp) and central pulse pressures (PPc) and the peripheral (AIp) and central augmentation indexes (AIc). We defined preliminary diagnostic thresholds, using the distributional characteristics of these hemodynamic measurements in a reference population. We randomly recruited 870 subjects from 3 European populations. PPp was the average difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured five times at one home visit. For measurement of PPc, AIp and AIc, we used the SphygmoCor device. We selected subjects without hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia in need of medical treatment or previous or concomitant cardiovascular disease. The study population included 228 men and 306 women (mean age 34.9 years). All hemodynamic measurements were curvilinearly related to age, and AIp and AIc were lower in men than in women. In men at age 40, the upper 95% prediction bands of the relations of the hemodynamic measurements with age approximated 60 mmHg for PPp, 40 mmHg for PPc, 90% for AIp, and 30% for AIc. For PPc, AIp and AIc, these thresholds must be adjusted for age, leading to lower and higher thresholds at younger and older age, respectively. In addition, in women of any age, the AIp and AIc thresholds must be increased by 10% and 7%, respectively. Pending validation in prospective outcome studies, distributional characteristics of arterial stiffness indexes in a reference population can be used to generate operational thresholds for use in clinical practice. (Hypertens Res 2006; 29: 475‐483)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojciechowska et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=534). Healthy reference population was evaluated on Diagnostic thresholds (upper 95% prediction bands) for peripheral and central pulse pressures and augmentation indexes. In healthy 40-year-old men, the upper 95% prediction bands for arterial stiffness were approximately 60 mmHg for peripheral pulse pressure, 40 mmHg for central pulse pressure, 90% for peripheral augmentation index, and 30% for central augmentation index, with adjustments needed for age and sex.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: