Key result
A positive heart rate turbulence outcome predicted cardiac mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus (HR 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-8.8; P=0.007).
Why the study?
Does heart rate turbulence predict cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus following acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=531)
Does heart rate turbulence predict cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus following acute myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 3.5 (95% CI 1.4–8.8)
p-value: p=0.007
Heart rate turbulence measured by 24-hour Holter ECG is a significant independent predictor of cardiac mortality in post-MI patients, regardless of whether they have diabetes.
May refine post-MI risk stratification in diabetes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have described the clinical utility of heart rate turbulence (HRT) as an autonomic predictor in risk-stratifying patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Some reports showed that diabetes mellitus (DM) affects the prognostic value of autonomic markers. We assessed the utility of HRT as a risk marker in post-MI patients with DM and without DM. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 231 consecutive DM patients and 300 non-DM patients after acute MI. HRT was measured using an algorithm based on 24-hour Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs), assessing 2 parameters: turbulence onset (TO) and turbulence slope (TS). HRT was considered positive when both TO ≥0% and TS ≤2.5 ms/R-R interval were met. The endpoint was defined as cardiac mortality. RESULTS: Of patients with DM, 9 patients (4%) were not utilized for HRT assessment because of frequent ventricular contractions or presence of atrial fibrillation. Forty-two of 222 patients (19%) were HRT positive. During follow-up of 876 ± 424 days, 26 patients (22%) reached the endpoint. Several factors including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), renal dysfunction, documentation of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), and a HRT-positive outcome had significant association with the endpoint. Multivariate analysis determined that renal dysfunction and a positive HRT outcome had significant value with a hazard ratio (HR) of 4.7 (95%CI, 1.9-11.5; P = 0.0008) and 3.5 (95%CI, 1.4-8.8; P = 0.007), respectively. In non-DM patients, only a positive HRT outcome had significant value. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that HRT detected by 24-hour Holter ECG can predict cardiac mortality in post-MI patients whether DM is present or not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miwa et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Myocardial Infarction (n=531). Positive heart rate turbulence (HRT) vs. Negative heart rate turbulence was evaluated on Cardiac mortality (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-8.8, p=0.007). A positive heart rate turbulence outcome predicted cardiac mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus (HR 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-8.8; P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: