Key result
Adding ivabradine to standard anti-heart failure treatment significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (RR 0.93) in patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Does ivabradine improve cardiopulmonary function, exercise capacity, and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=24,562)
Does ivabradine improve cardiopulmonary function, exercise capacity, and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Relative Risk: 0.93 (95% CI 0.87–0.98)
p-value: p=0.01
Adding ivabradine to standard heart failure therapy significantly improves cardiopulmonary function and exercise capacity, and reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure, though it increases the risk of visual symptoms.
Supports ivabradine in heart failure with elevated HR; confirms outcome benefits across pooled randomized trials.
(MD = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.05-4.55, P = 0.002) and the exercise capacity, including the exercise duration with a submaximal load (MD = 7.82, 95% CI: -2.57--18.21, P < 0.00001) and the 6-minute walk distance. The RR of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure was significantly decreased (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87--0.98, P = 0.01) in the patients treated with ivabradine. Additionally, the RRs of heart failure and hospitalization also decreased (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85--0.97, P = 0.006; RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79--0.93, P = 0.0002). Safety analysis showed no significant difference in the RR of severe adverse events between the ivabradine group and the standard anti-heart failure treatment group (P = 0.40). However, ivabradine significantly increased the RR of visual symptoms in CHF patients (RR = 3.82, 95% CI: 1.80--8.13, P = 0.0005).Existing evidence showed that adding ivabradine treatment significantly improved the cardiopulmonary function and increased the exercise capacity of patients with CHF. Adding ivabradine to the standard anti-heart failure treatment reduced the mortality and hospitalization risk and improved the quality of life. Finally, ivabradine significantly increased the RR of visual symptoms in CHF patients.This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to focus on the efficacy of ivabradine, which improved the cardiac function and increased the exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Therefore, this study will help evaluate the quality of life after adding ivabradine to the treatment of patients with CHF, even though there are differences in the standard for resting heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in the included studies. This hybrid effect might be smaller when analyzed separately but might have a higher heterogeneity when analyzed in multiple studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pei et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic Heart Failure (n=24,562). Ivabradine vs. Placebo or standard anti-heart failure treatment was evaluated on Cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p=0.01). Adding ivabradine to standard anti-heart failure treatment significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (RR 0.93) in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: