Key result
Women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a 20% higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality compared to men (OR 1.20), despite adjustment for age and comorbidities.
Why the study?
Does female sex increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and complications in adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to male sex?
Observational (n=6,601,526)
Yes
Does female sex increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and complications in adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to male sex?
Odds Ratio: 1.2 (95% CI 1.16–1.23)
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 1.4%
In a contemporary US cohort of 6.6 million PCI procedures, women had persistently higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications compared to men.
Sex disparities in PCI outcomes warrant ongoing risk adjustment in practice; leaves open whether targeted strategies can reduce gaps.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have reported inconsistencies in the baseline risk profile, comorbidity burden and their association with clinical outcomes in women compared to men. More importantly, there is limited data around the sex differences and how these have changed over time in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify all PCI procedures based on ICD-9 procedure codes in the United States between 2004-2014 in adult patients. Descriptive statistics were used to describe sex-based differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidity burden of patients. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to investigate the association between these differences and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay and total hospital charges. Among 6,601,526 patients, 66% were men and 33% were women. Women were more likely to be admitted with diagnosis of NSTEMI (non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction), were on average 5 years older (median age 68 compared to 63) and had higher burden of comorbidity defined by Charlson score ≥3. Women also had higher in-hospital crude mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%) and any complications compared to men (11.1% vs 7.0%). These trends persisted in our adjusted analyses where women had a significant increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality men (OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.16,1.23) and major bleeding (OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.77,1.86). CONCLUSION: In this national unselected contemporary PCI cohort, there are significant sex-based differences in presentation, baseline characteristics and comorbidity burden. These differences do not fully account for the higher in-hospital mortality and procedural complications observed in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potts et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=6,601,526). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16,1.23). Women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a 20% higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality compared to men (OR 1.20), despite adjustment for age and comorbidities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: