Key result
Five weeks of high-intensity interval training reduced systolic blood pressure by 3.8 mmHg (P=0.002) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.9 mmHg (P=0.002) in pre-hypertensive young adults.
Why the study?
Aerobic exercise training reduces high blood pressure, but the efficacy of different aerobic exercise types has not been determined in pre-hypertensive young adults.
Does high-intensity interval training or continuous moderate-intensity training reduce blood pressure in young physically inactive pre-hypertensive adults?
RCT (n=32)
Randomly assigned into 3 groups
Does high-intensity interval training or continuous moderate-intensity training reduce blood pressure in young physically inactive pre-hypertensive adults?
Both HIIT and CMT reduce systolic blood pressure in young pre-hypertensive adults, but HIIT provides additional benefits in reducing diastolic and mean arterial pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative efficacy of HIIT versus CMT for BP reduction in pre-hypertensive young adults remains unknown; leaves open optimal exercise selection.
The likelihood of a pre-hypertensive young adult to develop hypertension has been steadily increasing over the past few years. Aerobic exercise training (AET) has been found to reduce high blood pressure, however, efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise is yet to be determined among the pre-hypertensive young adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous moderate-intensity training (CMT) on blood pressure (BP) in young physically inactive pre-hypertensive adults. 32 adults (age 20.0±1.1) were randomly assigned into 3 groups; HIIT, CMT, and control (CON). HIIT and CMT groups participated in 5 weeks of AET with CON group not participating in any exercise. The HIIT protocol consisted of 1:4 minute work to rest ratio of participants 80%-85% heart rate reserve (HR-reserve) and 40%-60% HR-reserve respectively for 20 minutes, CMT group exercised at 40%-60% of HR-reserve continuously for 20 minutes. In both HIIT and CMT groups, systolic blood pressure (SBP) (3.8±2.8 mmHg, P=0.002 VS 1.6±1.5 mmHg, P=0.011) was significantly reduced. While, significant reductions were noted in the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (2.9±2.2 mmHg, P=0.002) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (3.1±1.6mmHg, P<0.0005) only in the HIIT group. No significant difference in SBP (-0.4±3.7 mmHg, P=0.718), DBP (0.4±3.4 mmHg, P=0.714), or MAP (0.1±2.5mmHg, P= 0.892) was observed in the CON group. Both HIIT and CMT decreased the BP in physically inactive pre-hypertensive young adults; however, HIIT yielded more beneficial results in terms of reducing the SPB, DBP, and MAP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Pre-hypertension (n=32). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous moderate-intensity training (CMT) vs. Control (no exercise) was evaluated on Blood pressure (SBP, DBP, MAP) (SBP reduction 3.8 mmHg (HIIT) and 1.6 mmHg (CMT), p=P=0.002 (HIIT), P=0.011 (CMT)). Five weeks of high-intensity interval training reduced systolic blood pressure by 3.8 mmHg (P=0.002) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.9 mmHg (P=0.002) in pre-hypertensive young adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: