Key result
Dyadic intervention Taking Care of Us improves physical health in heart failure vs. education.
Why the study?
Despite the significant impact of heart failure on both members of the care dyad, few interventions focus on optimizing the health of the dyad.
Does the Taking Care of Us dyadic intervention improve feasibility, acceptability, and health outcomes in couples living with heart failure?
RCT (n=37)
Block randomization by gender of the adult with HF
No
Does the Taking Care of Us dyadic intervention improve feasibility, acceptability, and health outcomes in couples living with heart failure?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.68
A virtual, couple-based dyadic intervention for heart failure is acceptable and shows promising preliminary efficacy in improving patient physical health.
Supports virtual dyadic interventions for heart failure couples; extends preliminary efficacy data for couple-focused approaches.
Background and Objectives: Despite the significant impact of heart failure on both members of the care dyad, few interventions focus on optimizing the health of the dyad. The current study examined the feasibility and acceptability of the novel Taking Care of Us (TCU) program with mid-late-life couples living with heart failure and explored preliminary efficacy. Research Design and Methods: This NIH Stage I study used a 2-arm randomized controlled trial with pretest-post-test design and an additional 5-month follow-up to compare TCU with an educational counseling attention-control condition. 37 couples were randomized to TCU (18 couples) or an educational control group (19 couples). Both programs were delivered virtually over 2 months. Results: = 12.73). Feasibility findings were mixed with over half of the eligible couples randomized, but only 67% of TCU couples completed the post-test. Acceptability of the TCU program was strong for both adults with heart failure and their partners. Recommendations for change focused on shortening session length, offering fewer sessions, and providing alternative modes of delivery. Exploratory between-group analyses found medium effect sizes for physical and mental health and dyadic management for both members of the couple, with many effects remaining 3 months later. Discussion and Implications: Findings suggest the TCU program is acceptable to couples with heart failure and shows promise for optimizing outcomes. Recommendations and strategies for improving retention and a more diverse sample are discussed. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04737759.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyons et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=37). Taking Care of Us (TCU) program vs. SUPPORT educational counseling attention-control condition (three sessions) was evaluated on Global physical health at post-test (adults with heart failure) (Cohen's d 0.68). The Taking Care of Us intervention was highly acceptable to couples with heart failure and demonstrated a medium effect size (Cohen's d 0.68) for improving physical health compared to an educational control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: