Key result
Multiplane TEE significantly increased the success rate for imaging the left ventricular long-axis view compared to single plane TEE (100% vs 50%, P<0.01) in a large swine model.
Why the study?
Does multiplane TEE improve imaging success compared to single plane TEE in a large swine model?
Does multiplane TEE improve imaging success compared to single plane TEE in a large swine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 50%
p-value: p=<0.01
Multiplane TEE provides superior overall cardiac imaging compared to single plane TEE in large swine, establishing normal echocardiographic reference values for this important preclinical model.
Multiplane TEE improves swine imaging success; leaves open standardization of closed-chest large-animal echocardiography protocols.
Transthoracic echocardiographic imaging has been difficult to attain in the swine model. This study: (1) compares multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with single plane TEE and intracardiac catheter echocardiography (ICE) for imaging of the swine cardiovascular system; and (2) defines normal values using these techniques in a closed chest large swine model (n = 24, body weight 50-114 kg). Multiplane TEE increased success rate over the single plane (the variable plane array only at 0 degrees ) TEE (P < 0.01) for imaging the left ventricular (LV) long-axis view (100% vs 50%), LV outflow tract (100% vs 33%), right atrium and its appendage (79% vs 33%), ascending aorta (100% vs 58%), and aortic arch (100% vs 17%). TEE-derived normal values at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) were: LV internal diameter (ID) = 49 +/- 3 mm (ED) and 33 +/- 4 mm (ES); LV wall thickness = 7 +/- 1 mm (ED); right ventricular (RV) ID = 24 +/- 4 mm (ED); RV wall thickness = 4 +/- 2 mm (ED); left atrial ID = 48 +/- 6 mm (ES); aortic root ID = 26 +/- 3 mm (ES); LV volume = 157 +/- 49 ml (ED) and 57 +/- 22 ml (ES). Baseline LV ejection fraction (64% +/- 6%), Doppler-derived stroke volume (86 +/- 14 ml), and cardiac index (107 ml/min per kg) were determined. Basal normal values, except for an elevated cardiac index in swine, are comparable to those reported for human adults. Multiplane TEE provided better overall cardiac imaging than did single plane TEE. ICE provided higher resolution imaging of individual cardiac chambers and structures when the ultrasound catheter was introduced into the right or left heart, but whole heart imaging was limited by ultrasound penetration at 12.5 MHz. Normal indices of chamber size and function provide a reference for the physiological significance of induced pathological states in this relevant animal model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (1997) studied Normal cardiovascular system in swine model (n=24). Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) vs. Single plane TEE was evaluated on Success rate for imaging the left ventricular long-axis view (p=<0.01). Multiplane TEE significantly increased the success rate for imaging the left ventricular long-axis view compared to single plane TEE (100% vs 50%, P<0.01) in a large swine model.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: