Key result
A distance to the hospital greater than 16 km was the strongest predictor of non-attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation following an acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.75).
Why the study?
Despite its well-established positive effects, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is underused in patients following an acute myocardial infarction.
Cohort (n=31,297)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1.75 (95% CI 1.64–1.86)
Identified factors linked to post-AMI exCR non-attendance may inform strategies; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Despite its well-established positive effects, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (exCR) is underused in patients following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with non-attendance at exCR in patients post-AMI in a large Swedish cohort. METHODS: A total of 31,297 patients who have suffered an AMI, mean age 62.4 ± 4 years, were included from the SWEDEHEART registry during the years 2010-2016. Comparisons between attenders and non-attenders at exCR were done at baseline for the following variables: age, sex, body mass index, occupational status, smoking, previous diseases, type of index cardiac event and intervention, and left ventricular function. Distance of residence from the hospital and type of hospital were added as structural variables in logistic regression analyses, with non-attendance at exCR at one-year follow-up as dependent, and with individual and structural variables as independent variables. RESULTS: In total, 16,214 (52%) of the patients did not attend exCR. The strongest predictor for non-attendance was distance to the exCR centre (OR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.64-1.86]). Other predictors for non-attendance included smoking, history of stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), AMI or diabetes, male sex, being retired vs. being employed, and being followed-up at a county hospital. Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and those intervened with PCI or CABG were more likely to attend exCR. CONCLUSIONS: A distance greater than 16 km was associated with increased probability of non-attendance at exCR, as were smoking, a higher burden of comorbidities, and male sex. A better understanding of individual and structural factors can support the development of future rehabilitation services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borg et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=31,297). Distance to the exCR centre vs. Shorter distance to the exCR centre was evaluated on Non-attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (exCR) at one-year follow-up (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.64-1.86). A distance to the hospital greater than 16 km was the strongest predictor of non-attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation following an acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: