Review highlights advances in peptide-based biomaterials for drug delivery, suggesting improvements for clinical application.
Peptide-based biomaterials have emerged as versatile tools for pharmaceutical drug delivery due to their biocompatibility and tunable sequences, yet a comprehensive overview of their categories, mechanisms, and optimization strategies remains lacking to guide clinical translation. This review systematically collates advances in peptide-based biomaterials, covering peptide excipients (cell penetrating peptides, tight junction modulating peptides, and peptide surfactants/stabilizers), self-assembling peptides (peptide-based nanospheres, cyclic peptide nanotubes, nanovesicles and micelles, peptide-based hydrogels and depots), and peptide linkers (for antibody drug-conjugates, peptide drug-conjugates, and prodrugs). We also dissect sequence-based optimization strategies, including rational design and biophysical optimization (cyclization, stapling, D-amino acid incorporation), functional motif integration, and combinatorial discovery with AI assistance, with examples spanning marketed drugs and research-stage candidates. The review reveals that cell-penetrating peptides enable efficient intracellular payload delivery via direct penetration or endocytosis; self-assembling peptides form diverse nanostructures for controlled release; and peptide linkers achieve site-specific drug release by responding to tumor-associated enzymes or pH cues, while sequence optimization enhances stability and targeting. Peptide-based biomaterials offer precise, biocompatible and tunable solutions for drug delivery, future advancements relying on AI-driven design and multi-functional modification will accelerate their transition from basic research to clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: