Key result
Smoking with airflow limitation is linked to ~55% higher odds of carotid wall thickening.
Why the study?
This study aimed to investigate the association between airflow limitation and carotid intima-media thickness according to smoking status in Japan.
Does airflow limitation and smoking experience increase the risk of increased carotid intima-media thickness in the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,809)
No
Does airflow limitation and smoking experience increase the risk of increased carotid intima-media thickness in the general population?
The presence of airflow limitation combined with smoking is independently associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, suggesting its value as a screening marker for future cardiovascular risk.
May support CV evaluation in smokers with airflow limitation; extends cross-sectional links to subclinical atherosclerosis but requires prospective validation.
Purpose: This study aimed to reveal the association between airflow limitation (AL) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) according to smoking status in Japan. Subjects and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in 2809 subjects, who underwent a comprehensive health examination with pulmonary function tests and carotid ultrasonographic measurement. AL was defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity of < 0.7. The subjects were divided into the following four groups: never smokers without AL, never smokers with AL, former/current smokers without AL, and former/current smokers with AL. Mean IMT, the maximum measurable IMT value in the left and right common carotid arteries (IMT-C max), and mean IMT-C max were measured by carotid ultrasonography. The carotid wall thickness as defined as follows: IMT ≥ 1.1 mm (IMT 1.1 ), IMT-C max ≥ 1.2 mm (IMTc 1.2 ), and IMT-C max > 1.5 mm (IMTc 1.5 ), based on each measured region. The association between AL and the carotid wall thickness according to smoking status was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean carotid IMT and mean IMT-C max were significantly higher in never smokers with AL and former/current smokers with or without AL than in never smokers without AL. In logistic regression models adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, physical activity, and alcohol consumption, the risk of carotid wall thickness (IMT 1.1 [odds ratio {OR}: 1.55; 95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.07– 2.24]; IMTc 1.2 [OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.03– 2.24]; IMTc 1.5 [OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.15– 3.46]) were significantly higher in former/current smokers with AL than in never smokers without AL. Conclusion: The present results suggest that greater IMT and risk of carotid wall thickness were associated with AL and smoking experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Airflow limitation and subclinical atherosclerosis (n=2,809). Airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC < 0.7) and former/current smoking vs. Never smokers without airflow limitation was evaluated on Carotid wall thickness (IMT ≥ 1.1 mm) (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.24, p=0.020). Former or current smoking combined with airflow limitation was associated with a significantly increased risk of carotid wall thickness (OR 1.55) compared to never smokers without airflow limitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: