Key result
Airflow limitation was significantly associated with greater maximum carotid intima-media thickness (1.27 vs. 1.18 mm) and an increased risk of carotid wall thickening (OR 1.44) compared to no airflow limitation.
Why the study?
Does airflow limitation associate with increased carotid atherosclerosis in a general Japanese population?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,099)
No
Does airflow limitation associate with increased carotid atherosclerosis in a general Japanese population?
Airflow limitation is significantly associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness, particularly in middle-aged individuals, suggesting it is an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis.
Airflow limitation may flag higher carotid atherosclerosis risk; leaves open causality and clinical utility pending longitudinal data.
BACKGROUND: There has been no large-scale observational study examining the association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or airflow limitation and carotid atherosclerosis in the general population across a wide range of generations in Asia. In the present study we assessed the association between airflow limitation and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in a general Japanese population, with consideration of a comprehensive array of cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all, 2,099 community-dwelling Japanese subjects were included in the study. Airflow limitation was defined by spirometry. Maximum and mean IMT values were measured using carotid ultrasonography. Among the subjects, 352 (16.8%) had airflow limitation. The geometric mean values of maximum IMT and mean IMT were significantly higher in subjects with than without airflow limitation (1.27 vs. 1.18 mm, respectively, for maximum IMT; 0.73 mm vs. 0.72 mm, respectively, for mean IMT) and increased with the severity of airflow limitation after adjustment for conventional risk factors, including smoking habits and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. It should be noted that the magnitude of these associations was greater in the middle-aged (40-64 years) than elderly (≥65 years) subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study suggest that airflow limitation is a significant risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis, especially in midlife, in the general Japanese population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kudo et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Airflow limitation and carotid atherosclerosis (n=2,099). Airflow limitation vs. No airflow limitation was evaluated on Maximum carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) (p=0.002). Airflow limitation was significantly associated with greater maximum carotid intima-media thickness (1.27 vs. 1.18 mm) and an increased risk of carotid wall thickening (OR 1.44) compared to no airflow limitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: