Foundational preprint presents a new mathematical framework for boundary-state calculus with implications for scientific claims verification.
Version 1.4.0 of a foundational preprint proposing Boundary-State Calculus as a typed mathematical audit calculus for claims that move between scientific descriptions. This release adds a bounded audit of a published Collatz recursive-sufficiency induction, proves replacement zero-density recursively-sufficient sieves, and retains an exact full-enumeration and first-descent receipt for a conditional finite-prefix extension. It leaves the BSC core framework unchanged and retains the operational-channel, electromagnetic, simulation-evidence, and normalized-scale layers. The package contains eleven mathematical fixtures and three deterministic execution receipts. It does not claim a proof of the Collatz conjecture, an independent replay of the external 2^71 base, an official verification record, a shared microscopic theory, physical validation, a derivation of the fine-structure constant, a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, a complete reference implementation, or peer review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Tree (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: