Key result
Complete histologic response strongly predicts prognosis in Ewing sarcoma, which carries ~65% five-year overall survival.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors across the entire cohort of patients with Ewing sarcoma included in the Euro-EWING99 trial.
What are the long-term survival outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with Ewing sarcoma treated in the Euro-EWING99 study?
Cohort (n=3,395)
Yes
What are the long-term survival outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with Ewing sarcoma treated in the Euro-EWING99 study?
Informs Ewing sarcoma prognosis and counseling; supports histologic response as prognostic factor but leaves open treatment optimization.
PURPOSE Euro-EWING99 study was a large, international, prospective study recruiting patients with Ewing sarcoma (EWS) between 1999 and 2015. It assessed three different clinical questions through randomized trials. We report here the characteristics and outcomes of all patients. METHODS Patients younger than 50 years with EWS were included in the study. They received induction chemotherapy (six courses of vincristine [day 1], ifosfamide [day 1-3], doxorubicin [day 1-3], and etoposide [day 1-3; VIDE], administered every 3 weeks), local therapy (surgery/radiotherapy), and different consolidation treatments according to clinical risk group and trial. The objectives of the study were to describe the entire cohort according to the initial staging group, to describe the survival outcomes (overall survival [OS]; progression-free survival [PFS]; and local control), and to evaluate prognostic factors associated with OS and PFS. RESULTS Three thousand three hundred ninety-five patients were included in the study, including 2,267 with a localized disease, 614 with pleuropulmonary metastases, and 514 with extrapulmonary metastases. Ninety-eight percent of patients received ≥4 neoadjuvant VIDE courses. The modalities of local treatment and consolidation therapy differed among the three staging groups. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years, PFS of the entire cohort was 60.2% and 55.4% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. OS was 72.6% and 64.6% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. In addition to metastatic status at diagnosis, main prognostic factors included patient age, tumor volume, and histologic response both for PFS and OS, independent of metastatic status. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this study is the largest published series of patients with EWS and may serve as a landmark paper for EWS. It confirms the major prognostic value of the complete histologic response after neoadjuvant therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valentin et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ewing sarcoma (n=3,395). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (VIDE) and local/consolidation therapy was evaluated on Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In a cohort of 3,395 patients with Ewing sarcoma, 5-year progression-free survival was 55.4% and overall survival was 64.6%, with complete histologic response being a major prognostic factor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: