Investigates a new calibration method for five-hole probes in low-Reynolds number flows, suggesting reduced measurement errors.
Five-hole probes are a well-established measurement technique for flow surveys in fluid mechanics and fluid machinery, where the probe calibration is known to become sensitive to Reynolds number below a probe-geometry-specific critical Reynolds number. Nevertheless, probes are typically calibrated at a single Reynolds number—particularly for use in incompressible flow-resulting in significant measurement errors in typical technical flows with strong velocity and Reynolds number variations. To address this limitation, this paper presents a Reynolds number-dependent calibration method based on repeated probe calibration over Reynolds numbers ranging from 2000 to 20000. A novel Reynolds number coefficient is introduced, extending conventional two-dimensional calibration maps into a three-dimensional calibration space. Two data-reduction strategies are investigated: three-dimensional interpolation and artificial neural networks. The proposed method is evaluated using the open-access Oxford Probe and compared against conventional probe calibrations at constant Reynolds number. Compared with conventional constant-Reynolds number calibrations, the proposed Reynolds number-dependent approach reduced the errors by up to 50\,% 50 % in flow angles, 70\,% 70 % in total pressure, and 60\,% 60 % in dynamic pressure. Artificial neural network-based regression provides a further reduction of approximately 30\,% 30 % relative to the interpolation-based calibration in all flow quantities. A parametric study demonstrates the effects of network architecture and size on the calibration errors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stürznickel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: