Squib investigates contrast sluicing in Japanese, revealing asymmetries in multiple wh-question structures.
In this squib we investigate contrast sluicing in Japanese with multiple wh questions antecedents. Contrast sluicing in such cases presents a puzzling asymmetry, which reflects the differing status of the two wh-phrases in pair-list multiple wh questions (Kuno, 1982, Dayal, 1996; a.o.). We will argue that this asymmetry can be explained through careful consideration of the syntax/semantics of pair-list questions, together with the common movement-and-deletion approach to the derivation of contrast sluicing (see e.g. Merchant, 2001) and the possibility of argument ellipsis in Japanese.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erlewine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: