PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 2, 2026Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance

When does difference make a difference? A bibliometric analysis and process-contingency framework of cognitive diversity research

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

APAmarnath PadhiAKAnil Kumar

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Bibliometric analysis explores cognitive diversity outcomes in organizations, suggesting process-driven strategies for effectiveness.

Key Points

  • This research aims to resolve contradictions in cognitive diversity outcomes by identifying influencing processes and conditions.
  • Analyzed 210 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus (2000–2024) using bibliometric methods.
  • Examined publication trends, citation patterns, thematic clusters, and geographic distribution.
  • Developed a process-contingency framework based on theoretical insights from the analysis.
  • Cognitive diversity research increased rapidly since 2016, focusing on five themes.
  • Identified three mediators: cognitive integration capability, conflict transformation, and psychological safety.
  • Highlighted three contextual moderators: inclusive leadership, organizational culture, and digital collaboration platforms that influence cognitive diversity outcomes.

Cite This Study

Padhi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6eeb4d1b0468a7eeab45f9https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-11-2025-1060
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share