Key result
Intensive lifestyle intervention (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.18-1.81) and goal-based monitoring with pharmacotherapy (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.16-1.97) improved blood pressure control compared to education.
Why the study?
Do intensive lifestyle intervention or frequent goal-based monitoring with pharmacotherapy improve systolic blood pressure control compared to education and support in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=1,609)
Do intensive lifestyle intervention or frequent goal-based monitoring with pharmacotherapy improve systolic blood pressure control compared to education and support in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes?
Odds Ratio: 1.46 (95% CI 1.18–1.81)
Both intensive lifestyle intervention and frequent goal-based monitoring with pharmacological management are effective strategies for achieving blood pressure control in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes.
May support intensive BP strategies in obese T2D; leaves open causality and practice change pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: The relative effectiveness of 3 approaches to blood pressure control-(i) an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) focused on weight loss, (ii) frequent goal-based monitoring of blood pressure with pharmacological management, and (iii) education and support-has not been established among overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes who are appropriate for each intervention. METHODS: Participants from the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) cohorts who met criteria for both clinical trials were identified. The proportions of these individuals with systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mm Hg from annual standardized assessments over time were compared with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Across 4 years among 480 Look AHEAD and 1,129 ACCORD participants with baseline SBPs between 130 and 159 mm Hg, ILI (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = [1.18-1.81]) and frequent goal-based monitoring with pharmacotherapy (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = [1.16-1.97]) yielded higher rates of blood pressure control compared to education and support. The intensive behavioral-based intervention may have been more effective among individuals with body mass index >30 kg/m2, while frequent goal-based monitoring with medication management may be more effective among individuals with lower body mass index (interaction P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Among overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes, both ILI and frequent goal-based monitoring with pharmacological management can be successful strategies for blood pressure control. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: clinicaltrials.gov identifiers NCT00017953 (Look AHEAD) and NCT00000620 (ACCORD).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Espeland et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=1,609). Intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) and frequent goal-based monitoring with pharmacotherapy vs. Education and support was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.18-1.81). Intensive lifestyle intervention (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.18-1.81) and goal-based monitoring with pharmacotherapy (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.16-1.97) improved blood pressure control compared to education.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: