Key result
Self-expanding nitinol stent grafts for vascular injury after TAVI resulted in comparable 1-year mortality to a matched cohort without vascular injury.
Why the study?
Does the routine use of a self-expanding nitinol stent graft safely and effectively manage access-site and access-related vascular injury in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
Cohort (n=407)
Does the routine use of a self-expanding nitinol stent graft safely and effectively manage access-site and access-related vascular injury in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI?
Routine use of a self-expanding nitinol stent graft is a feasible and safe strategy for managing access-site vascular injuries during transfemoral TAVI, yielding clinical outcomes comparable to patients without such complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports stent-graft use for TAVI vascular injury; hypothesis-generating pending randomized data.
BACKGROUND: Access-site and access-related vascular injury (ASARVI) is still a major limiting factor in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and affects the outcome of patients. Management strategies for ASARVI include manual compression, stent grafts, and vascular surgery. We hypothesized that the standard use of a self-expanding stent graft for the management of ASARVI is feasible and safe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 407 patients treated by transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation, 110 experienced ASARVI (27.0%). Of these, 96 (87.3%) were managed by the implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent graft. In the majority of patients, minor vascular complications triggered the implantation of a stent graft (86.5%), mainly because of bleeding (90.6%) and dissection (5.2%) of the common femoral artery with high rates of primary treatment success (97.9%). Patients receiving stent grafts were more often female (62.2 versus 45.6%, P<0.01), had higher body mass indices (27.8±6.7 versus 25.7±4.7, P=0.01), and suffered more often from diabetes mellitus (34.4 versus 24.5%, P=0.04). Angiographic assessment after a median follow-up of 345 days (interquartile range, 23-745 days) revealed only one patient with moderate, asymptomatic instent-stenosis (1.0%). Compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients without ASARVI, stented patients had comparable long-term mortality, despite the occurrence of a vascular complication (1-year mortality: 17.7% versus 26.6%; stent versus matched cohort, respectively; P=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of a self-expanding nitinol stent graft in selected patients experiencing ASARVI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is feasible, safe, and associated with favorable short- and midterm clinical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sedaghat et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with access-site and access-related vascular injury (n=407). Self-expanding nitinol stent graft vs. Propensity score-matched cohort without access-site and access-related vascular injury was evaluated on 1-year mortality (p=0.1). Self-expanding nitinol stent grafts for vascular injury after TAVI resulted in comparable 1-year mortality to a matched cohort without vascular injury.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: