Key result
A retrospective study of 229 patients with partial flail mitral leaflet found that a valve-repair procedure was feasible in two thirds of surgically treated patients.
Why the study?
Does surgery improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to partial flail mitral leaflet?
Does surgery improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to partial flail mitral leaflet?
This editorial discusses a retrospective study evaluating the timing of surgery and long-term outcomes in patients with severe mitral regurgitation due to partial flail mitral leaflet.
In this issue of the Journal, Ling et al.1 present a retrospective study of long-term clinical outcomes in a large group of patients with mitral regurgitation diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic. Because the study included only patients with a diagnosis of partial flail mitral leaflet, echocardiography could be used to document severe regurgitation in most patients (in earlier reports, the degree of mitral regurgitation was often uncertain); a valve-repair procedure was feasible in two thirds of the patients treated surgically. Although 71 percent of the 229 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I or II when . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Ross (1996) conducted an editorial in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=229). Surgery / valve-repair procedure was evaluated. A retrospective study of 229 patients with partial flail mitral leaflet found that a valve-repair procedure was feasible in two thirds of surgically treated patients.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: