Key result
Elevated pan-immune-inflammatory value linked to increased MI risk in unstable angina.
Why the study?
This study investigated whether the pan-immune-inflammatory value could predict myocardial infarction risk in patients with unstable angina pectoris and subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Does the pan-immune-inflammatory value predict myocardial infarction risk and MACE after PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris?
Cohort (n=263)
No
Does the pan-immune-inflammatory value predict myocardial infarction risk and MACE after PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support MI risk stratification in unstable angina; leaves open predictive utility for MACE after PCI.
Objective: This study investigates the potential of the pan-immune-inflammatory value (PIV) as a predictive indicator for myocardial infarction (MI) risk in unstable angina pectoris (UAP) patients and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: UAP patients diagnosed with MI underwent PCI and were monitored for MACE, including mortality, recurrent MI, revascularization, cerebrovascular accidents, and heart failure admissions. Clinical profiles and PIV levels were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to identify variables associated with MI and MACE risk. Results: MI patients had higher PIV (409.07 ± 127.63 vs 284.44 ± 126.96 × 10 1 8 /L 2 , P < 0.001) and LDL-C (2.91 ± 1.04 vs 2.31 ± 1.06 mmol/L, P < 0.001) levels. Both PIV (OR = 1.008, P < 0.001) and LDL-C (OR = 1.694, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of MI. ROC analysis showed that PIV had stronger discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.755) than LDL-C (AUC = 0.661), with their combined model improving predictive performance (AUC = 0.787). In PCI-treated MI patients, those developing MACE had higher PIV (452.66 ± 105.24 vs 378.45 ± 133.53 × 10 1 8 /L 2 , P = 0.001) and TC levels (4.84 ± 0.39 vs 4.66 ± 0.42 mmol/L, P = 0.010). Both TC (OR = 3.337, P = 0.007) and PIV (OR = 1.005, P = 0.001) were independently associated with MACE. The combined model (AUC = 0.721) outperformed individual markers. Conclusion: PIV is independently associated with MI risk in UAP patients and MACE following PCI. Combining PIV with lipid markers may enhance clinical risk assessment and inform management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Unstable Angina Pectoris (n=263). Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value (PIV) vs. Lower PIV was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (OR 1.008, 95% CI 1.005-1.010, p=<0.001). Elevated pan-immune-inflammatory value was independently associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina pectoris (OR 1.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: