Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of emotion regulation (ER; i.e. intra-psychic tactic(s) to manage one’s emotions) interventions to change physical activity and to explore potential moderators of the findings. Eligible studies were published in a peer-reviewed journal in English, included an experimental design with physical activity as the dependent variable and ER as the independent variable, among adults (>18 yrs.). A literature search completed in March 2025, using six common databases, yielded 30 independent effect sizes. Random-effects meta-analysis, after removing four outliers (N = 1934), showed positive changes in physical activity favoring the intervention over the control group g = 0.24 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.36). The point estimate, however, showed significant (Q = 40.32, p = 0.03) heterogeneity, and follow-up moderator analyses found that studies with smaller sample sizes, all-female samples, validated self-report of physical activity, feasibility designs, shorter interventions, and shorter follow-up assessments of physical activity reported significantly larger effect sizes when compared to larger samples, mixed gender samples, direct physical activity assessments, and effectiveness trials with longer durations and follow-up periods. Overall, the findings show that physical activity may change as a result of experimental intervention using ER approaches, but estimates are biased by preliminary phase studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhodes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: