Key result
Dexmedetomidine resulted in an average no-reflow area of 38±5% compared to 14±3% in the ischemia-reperfusion control group (P=0.0116).
Why the study?
Does dexmedetomidine reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model?
RCT (n=24)
Randomly divided
Does dexmedetomidine reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model?
Absolute Event Rate: 38% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.0116
Dexmedetomidine alters hemodynamic parameters and no-reflow area in a rabbit model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Dexmedetomidine may attenuate myocardial IRI in rabbits; leaves open clinical relevance pending human data.
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of dexmedetomidine on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in rabbits. METHODS: Twenty-four New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into two equal-sized groups: IRI group (group IR) and dexmedetomidine group (group D). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), left ventricular diastolic pressure (LVDP), +dp/dtmax, -dp/dtmax, and t-dp/dtmax were recorded and calculated at the following time points: before (T0) and after (T1) dexmedetomidine infusion, after 30-min ischemia (T2), and after 120-min reperfusion (T3). The levels of plasma endothelin 1 (ET-1), thromboxane A2 (TXA2), and platelet activating factor (PAF); area of myocardial infarction (MI); and no-reflow area were evaluated. RESULTS: SBP, DBP, LVSP, LVEDP, LVDP, and +dp/dtmax at T3 were higher in group D than in group IR (P<0.05). The average no-reflow area in group IR was significantly smaller than that in group D (14±3% vs. 38±5%, P=0.0116). The ET-1, TXA2, and PAF levels at T2 and T3 were higher than those at T0 in both groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine could reduce the magnitude of ischemic myocardial no-reflow area and protect the myocardium with ischemia-reperfusion injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=24). Dexmedetomidine vs. Ischemia-reperfusion injury alone (Group IR) was evaluated on Average no-reflow area (p=0.0116). Dexmedetomidine resulted in an average no-reflow area of 38±5% compared to 14±3% in the ischemia-reperfusion control group (P=0.0116).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: