Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ten patients with definite multiple sclerosis underwent hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with a 3.5 kilogauss superconducting magnet, using the inversion recovery and spin-echo techniques of signal acquisition. Results were compared with high-resolution x-ray computed tomography. Spin-echo images demonstrated abnormal regions as areas of variably increased signal intensity. The contrast between abnormal and normal white matter improved as the intervals between sequential radiofrequency pulses and between pulse administration and signal sampling were increased. Inversion recovery images demonstrated abnormal areas as regions of decreased signal intensity but did not visualize lesions as well as spin-echo imaging. Spin-echo and inversion recovery imaging each demonstrated more extensive abnormalities than did computed tomography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukes et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: