Key result
Rosiglitazone did not significantly reduce carotid IMT progression in the mixed cohort, but reduced mean CCA IMT progression in the T2DM subgroup (-0.005 mm vs 0.021 mm, P=0.007).
Why the study?
Does rosiglitazone reduce the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance syndrome?
RCT (n=555)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does rosiglitazone reduce the progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance syndrome?
Rosiglitazone does not significantly reduce carotid IMT progression in a mixed cohort of patients with T2DM and insulin resistance syndrome, though it may have a modest effect on CCA IMT in T2DM patients specifically.
Rosiglitazone did not slow carotid IMT progression in mixed T2DM/IRS patients; challenges expectations from smaller studies and leaves open T2DM subgroup effects.
OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance is associated with progression of atherosclerosis. We assessed the effect of 12 months of treatment with rosiglitazone (RSG) on the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or the insulin resistance syndrome (IRS). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 555 subjects (200 with T2DM and 355 nondiabetics with IRS according to EGIR criteria), aged 35-80 years. 447 subjects (165 T2DM and 282 IRS) completed the study. INTERVENTION: Participants were allocated to placebo or RSG 4 mg for 2 months and then 8 mg daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in composite IMT [mean IMT in the common carotid artery (CCA) and maximal IMT in the bulb] was the primary and various other IMT measures were secondary outcome variables. RESULTS: There was no effect of RSG treatment in the mixed population. In T2DM patients there was a reduced progression of the composite IMT (mean change: 0.041 vs. 0.070 mm, P = 0.07), and of the mean IMT CCA (mean change: -0.005 mm vs. 0.021 mm, P = 0.007). RSG treatment led to significant reductions of HOMA-IR, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, PAI-1 activity, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein and matrix metalloproteinase-9. CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed study population of patients with T2DM and IRS RSG treatment was not associated with a statistically significant reduction of carotid IMT progression rate. Separate analyses of these two patient groups indicated, however, a significant beneficial effect on CCA IMT in T2DM patients but no similar effect in subjects with IRS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedblad et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance syndrome (n=555). Rosiglitazone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in composite IMT [mean IMT in the common carotid artery (CCA) and maximal IMT in the bulb]. Rosiglitazone did not significantly reduce carotid IMT progression in the mixed cohort, but reduced mean CCA IMT progression in the T2DM subgroup (-0.005 mm vs 0.021 mm, P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: