Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The apparent durability of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers (PEMWEs) employing RuO2 anodes varies significantly, even though RuO2 is often used as a benchmark for Ru-based catalysts. We find that the in-plane conductivity effectively indicates key microstructural characteristics that govern the apparent durability. Low in-plane conductivity (e.g., <10 S cm–1 in this study) limits electron transport and catalyst utilization while increasing susceptibility to electrochemical degradation. Only when in-plane conductivity is sufficiently high (above ∼25 S cm–1 in this study) does apparent device durability reflect the intrinsic electrochemical stability of RuO2 catalysts. Increasing the isopropanol ratio in the catalyst ink or adding carbon black as a conductive additive markedly enhances in-plane conductivity, extending device durability from 10.7 to 63.5 h (5.9-fold) at 1 A cm–2. This work clarifies the origin of apparent stability discrepancies among RuO2 catalysts in PEMWEs, identifying in-plane conductivity as a key structural descriptor for reliable durability assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: