Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commercial ruthenium oxide is commonly used as a benchmark for evaluating the activity of acidic water oxidation catalysts (WOCs). However, the performance of different commercial RuO2 (c-RuO2) varies greatly in the different literatures. Inconsistent standards are detrimental to the development of WOCs. Herein, we compared the acidic water oxidation performance of c-RuO2 from different suppliers under identical testing conditions. The results indicate that the c-RuO2 can be classified into two types according to their catalytic performance, the low η10 (overpotential at 10 mA/cm2) type and the high η10 type. The low η10 can be as low as ∼170 mV and the high η10 is around 240 mV. The c-RuO2 with low η10 are crystalline-amorphous while the high η10 commercial RuO2 are crystalline. This study provides a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the performance of acidic WOCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: