Key result
Atrial fibrillation severity and rhythm were strongly associated with two left atrial gene co-expression modules, identifying RCAN1 and CPEB3 as central hub genes in AF pathogenesis.
Why the study?
Does atrial fibrillation severity and rhythm correlate with specific left atrial gene co-expression modules in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Cross-Sectional (n=156)
No
Does atrial fibrillation severity and rhythm correlate with specific left atrial gene co-expression modules in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Transcriptomic network analysis of left atrial tissue identifies distinct gene modules and hub genes (such as RCAN1) that correlate with AF severity, offering novel molecular targets for understanding and potentially treating atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gene modules tied to AF severity warrant no practice change; leaves open validation of RCAN1 and CPEB3 as therapeutic targets.
BACKGROUND: Genetic mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) remain incompletely understood. Previous differential expression studies in AF were limited by small sample size and provided limited understanding of global gene networks, prompting the need for larger-scale, network-based analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial tissues from Cleveland Clinic patients who underwent cardiac surgery were assayed using Illumina Human HT-12 mRNA microarrays. The data set included 3 groups based on cardiovascular comorbidities: mitral valve (MV) disease without coronary artery disease (n=64), coronary artery disease without MV disease (n=57), and lone AF (n=35). Weighted gene coexpression network analysis was performed in the MV group to detect modules of correlated genes. Module preservation was assessed in the other 2 groups. Module eigengenes were regressed on AF severity or atrial rhythm at surgery. Modules whose eigengenes correlated with either AF phenotype were analyzed for gene content. A total of 14 modules were detected in the MV group; all were preserved in the other 2 groups. One module (124 genes) was associated with AF severity and atrial rhythm across all groups. Its top hub gene, RCAN1, is implicated in calcineurin-dependent signaling and cardiac hypertrophy. Another module (679 genes) was associated with atrial rhythm in the MV and coronary artery disease groups. It was enriched with cell signaling genes and contained cardiovascular developmental genes including TBX5. CONCLUSIONS: Our network-based approach found 2 modules strongly associated with AF. Further analysis of these modules may yield insight into AF pathogenesis by providing novel targets for functional studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=156). Atrial fibrillation severity and rhythm vs. No history of atrial fibrillation (sinus rhythm) was evaluated on Association of gene module eigengenes with atrial fibrillation severity or atrial rhythm at surgery (p=1.1x10^-14). Atrial fibrillation severity and rhythm were strongly associated with two left atrial gene co-expression modules, identifying RCAN1 and CPEB3 as central hub genes in AF pathogenesis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: