Key result
A systematic review identified 21 pieces of evidence across six categories to address kinesiophobia post-PCI, emphasizing pre-intervention assessment, psychological support, and health education.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to systematically explore and summarize the best evidence on intervention programs for patients with kinesophobia following percutaneous coronary intervention to provide a reference for clinical practice.
What is the best evidence for intervention programs to address kinesiophobia in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention?
Systematic Review
What is the best evidence for intervention programs to address kinesiophobia in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention?
This systematic review summarizes 21 pieces of evidence across six categories to guide clinical interventions for reducing kinesiophobia and improving exercise rehabilitation compliance in patients post-PCI.
May support pre-PCI kinesiophobia assessment and education; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Objective: The objective of this study is to systematically explore and summarize the best evidence on intervention programs for patients with kinesophobia following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to provide a comprehensive reference for clinical practice interventions. Methods: Evidence on interventions for kinesophobia post-PCI was retrieved from Chinese and international integrated databases, treatment guidelines, and websites of professional associations, including systematic reviews and expert consensuses. The evidence considered in this study extends up to May 2022, encompassing information available since the inception of the databases. Two researchers independently evaluated the articles included in the review and extracted and summarized the available evidence. Results: By extracting and integrating data from the 14 articles included in this review, we identified six categories: pre-intervention assessment, psychological intervention, health education, rehabilitation training, social support, and quality control. A total of 21 pieces of evidence were summarized, including mental health assessment, physical fitness evaluation, timing and content of health education, development of personalized exercise prescriptions, and risk control. Conclusion: In clinical settings, using evidence-based practices requires developing feasible intervention programs based on comprehensive consideration of hospital resources, allocation of medical personnel, and consideration of patients' preferences to reduce the kinesophobia of patients post-PCI and improve their compliance with exercise rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Kinesiophobia post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intervention programs (assessment, psychological intervention, health education, rehabilitation, social support, quality control) was evaluated on Best evidence on intervention programs for kinesiophobia post-PCI. A systematic review identified 21 pieces of evidence across six categories to address kinesiophobia post-PCI, emphasizing pre-intervention assessment, psychological support, and health education.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: