Key result
Tactical breathing significantly improved initial hit scores in student soldiers compared to the control group (average 1.9 points better, d = 1.698, p < .001).
Why the study?
Does tactical breathing improve marksmanship performance in student soldiers?
RCT (n=100)
randomly assigned
Does tactical breathing improve marksmanship performance in student soldiers?
Standardized Mean Difference: 1.698
p-value: p=< .001
Tactical breathing significantly improves initial marksmanship accuracy in student soldiers.
Hypothesis-generating for tactical breathing in marksmanship training; randomized trials needed before adoption.
In this study, we investigated the effect of tactical breathing (breath-based stress management) on marksmanship performance in a randomized between-subjects design. The total of n = 100 participants (18% female) were all student soldiers and randomly assigned to the intervention group (tactical breathing) or the control group. In the German Armed Forces shooting simulator, participants shot ten rounds at ten meters with the P8 (Heckler and Koch). In addition, the effect of neuroticism, fear of failure, and resilience on shooting performance and the interaction of those traits with the experimental condition were examined. Overall, the total hit score showed a strong ceiling effect, so the more difficult initial hit was primarily used as a performance criterion. None of the personality traits significantly affected the initial hit, and there were no interactions between the experimental condition and the personality traits. However, there was a significant difference in initial hit between the control and experimental group, as the tactical breathing group shot an average of 1.9 points better, t(98) = 8.489, p < .001, d = 1.698. Considering the initial shot, which was more difficult due to the uncocked trigger, tactical breathing proved to be an effective method for increasing marksmanship performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2023) reported an RCT. Tactical breathing vs. Control group was evaluated on Initial hit score (d = 1.698, p=< .001). Tactical breathing significantly improved initial hit scores in student soldiers compared to the control group (average 1.9 points better, d = 1.698, p < .001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: