Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism using the Amaris 750S 750 Hz excimer laser. SETTING: Private LASIK center, Tokyo, Japan. DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism (spherical equivalent -0.50 to -11.63 diopters [D]), a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/20 or better, and an estimated residual bed thickness of 300 μm or more had LASIK using the aspheric aberration-free ablation profile of the 750 Hz scanning-spot laser and the Femto LDV Crystal Line femtosecond laser for flap creation. Study parameters included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), CDVA, manifest refraction, astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). RESULTS: The study included 1280 eyes (685 patients). At 3 months, 96.6% of eyes had a UDVA of 20/20 or better and 99.1% had 20/32 or better; 94.1% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D of the intended correction and 98.9% were within ± 1.00 D; 89.7% of eyes had no residual cylinder and 96.0% had a postoperative astigmatism of less than 0.50 D. All eyes had a postoperative CDVA of 20/20 or better. The HOAs increased postoperatively (P<.001), with mean total postoperative corneal and ocular HOAs of 0.66 μm ± 0.20 (SD) and 0.56 ± 0.23 μm, respectively. The efficacy index and safety index were 1.02 and 1.06, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis with the 750 Hz scanning-spot laser was safe, effective, and predictable. No specific clinical side effects that might be associated with a high repetition rate occurred. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Mr. Magnago is an employee of Schwind eye-tech-solutions GmbH. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomita et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: