This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: CA 19-9 is an important tumor marker for pancreatic cancer, but is also seen in non-malignant conditions such as cholelithiasis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and other non-pancreaticobiliary conditions such as interstitial lung disease. This is a case of markedly elevated CA 19-9 found in the setting of a simple biliary cyst in the liver and heavy black tea consumption. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 34-year-old woman with no significant past medical history presented to the ER for acute onset RUQ pain and nausea with vomiting. She had an ultrasound showing a 10.8 × 16.1 × 9.5 cm cystic lesion. Follow-up CT described the lesion as a large non-enhancing, hypoattenuating mass within the medial segment of the left lobe, most likely representing a cyst. AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, albumin, INR and CBC were normal. AFP was <2.0 and CA 19-9 was 45,266 U/mL. On further interview, she reported drinking large amounts of black tea daily. She underwent a left lobectomy, with pathology showing simple biliary cyst. After surgery, her symptoms resolved and she reduced tea consumption to once weekly. Her CA 19-9 level decreased to 29 U/mL by 1 month post-resection, and remains normal 1 year later. DISCUSSION: The first case report of an association between heavy black tea consumption and elevated CA 19-9 hypothesized that the high gallated flavenoid content in black tea can impact a range of molecular targets influencing cell growth through the angiogenesis pathway. 1,2 In a study of 270 healthy individuals with heavy black tea consumption, 43.3% had elevated levels of CA 19-9 between 69-105 U/mL. The remainder of individuals had levels of 40 U/mL or lower. The proposed mechanism was stimulated production of CA 19-9 in epithelial tissues. While the exact mechanisms remain unknown, the presence of heavy black tea consumption should be considered in patients with elevated CA 19-9 in the absence of pancreaticobiliary disease because it is an easily modifiable factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: