Key result
Over 4 years, left ventricular end-systolic elastance increased by 14% (2.10 to 2.26 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001) and end-diastolic elastance increased by 8% (P<0.0001), despite reduced arterial load.
Why the study?
Does left ventricular stiffness increase longitudinally over time in human subjects?
Cohort (n=788)
Does left ventricular stiffness increase longitudinally over time in human subjects?
Effect estimate: 14% increase
Absolute Event Rate: 2.26% vs 2.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Left ventricular systolic and diastolic stiffness increase over time in humans, particularly in women, independent of reductions in arterial load.
Supports progressive LV stiffening independent of load; leaves open mechanisms, sex differences, and clinical relevance.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies suggest that left ventricular (LV) and arterial elastance (stiffness) increase with age, but data examining longitudinal changes within human subjects are lacking. In addition, it remains unknown whether age-related LV stiffening is merely a reaction to arterial stiffening or caused by other processes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comprehensive echo-Doppler cardiography was performed in 1402 subjects participating in a randomly selected community-based study at 2 examinations separated by 4 years. From this population, 788 subjects had adequate paired data to determine LV end-systolic elastance (Ees), end-diastolic elastance (Eed), and effective arterial elastance. Throughout 4 years, blood pressure, arterial elastance, and LV mass decreased, coupled with significantly greater use of antihypertensive medications. However, despite reductions in arterial load, Ees increased by 14% (2.10±0.67-2.26±0.70 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001) and Eed increased by 8% (0.13±0.03-0.14±0.04 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001). Increases in Eed were greater in women than men, whereas Ees changes were similar. Age-related increases in Ees and Eed were correlated with changes in body weight, but were similar in subjects with or without cardiovascular disease. Changes in Ees were correlated with Eed (r=0.5; P<0.0001), but not with other measures of contractility, indicating that the increase in Ees was reflective of passive stiffening rather than enhanced systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reductions in arterial load with medical therapy, LV systolic and diastolic stiffness increase over time in humans, particularly in women. In addition to blood pressure control, therapies targeting load-independent ventricular stiffening may be effective to treat and prevent age-associated cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borlaug et al. (2013) reported a cohort. Time (4 years of aging) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) (14% increase, p=<0.0001). Over 4 years, left ventricular end-systolic elastance increased by 14% (2.10 to 2.26 mm Hg/mL; P<0.0001) and end-diastolic elastance increased by 8% (P<0.0001), despite reduced arterial load.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: