Key result
A 6-month home-based coaching program had no effect on heart rate variability in subacute stroke patients, but increased walking distance.
Why the study?
Autonomic imbalance in stroke involves increased sympathetic and reduced vagal activity, and physical activity may counteract these autonomic impairments.
Does a 6-month home-based coaching program improve heart rate variability in subacute stroke patients?
RCT (n=84)
randomly assigned
Does a 6-month home-based coaching program improve heart rate variability in subacute stroke patients?
A 6-month home-based coaching program improved functional walking capacity but did not affect autonomic balance as measured by heart rate variability in subacute stroke patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports home-based coaching to improve walking distance in subacute stroke; extends rehabilitation evidence while questioning HRV as a required mechanism.
Autonomic imbalance in stroke is characterized by increased sympathetic activity and reduced vagal nerve activity. Physical activity could be a strategy to counteract autonomic control impairments after a stroke. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect on heart rate variability of a 6-month coaching program in a home setting in subacute stroke patients. Eighty-four stroke patients participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to the experimental group or the control group. The intervention was a coaching program, consisting of physical activity, home visits and a weekly phone call. Patients were evaluated after hospital discharge (T0) and at the end of the 6-month period (T1). Heart rate variability measures were recorded in the supine and orthostatic positions. Time and frequency domain values were treated using Kubios. Distance on 6 minutes walking test (6MWT), Barthel and motricity index and modified functional ambulation categories were evaluated. No effects were found on time and frequency domain values in the supine and orthostatic positions in either group. Walking distance on 6MWT increased significantly between T0 and T1 in experimental group (377 ± 141-448 ± 140 m; P < 0.02) with no effects in control group (373.6 ± 150.6-394.6 ± 176.4 m). No other functional effects were found. A coaching program in a home setting had no effect on heart rate variability, probably due to time of recovery and exercise intensity. Future research is needed to understand the lack of changes in heart rate variability by physical activity in subacute stroke patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guediri et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in subacute stroke (n=84). Home-based coaching program vs. Control group was evaluated on Heart rate variability (time and frequency domain values in supine and orthostatic positions). A 6-month home-based coaching program had no effect on heart rate variability in subacute stroke patients, but increased walking distance.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: