Key result
Athletes identified as High Risk by an injury prediction algorithm had a greater risk of noncontact lower extremity injury during the season (RR 3.4; 95% CI 2.0 to 6.0).
Why the study?
Does an injury prediction algorithm accurately categorize the risk of noncontact lower extremity injury in collegiate athletes?
Cohort (n=183)
Does an injury prediction algorithm accurately categorize the risk of noncontact lower extremity injury in collegiate athletes?
Relative Risk: 3.4 (95% CI 2–6)
Absolute Event Rate: 42.9% vs 12.5%
An injury prediction algorithm using field-ready tests can identify collegiate athletes at elevated risk for noncontact lower extremity injuries.
Should not yet change practice; supports further validation of algorithm-guided prevention in prospective trials.
In athletics, efficient screening tools are sought to curb the rising number of noncontact injuries and associated health care costs. The authors hypothesized that an injury prediction algorithm that incorporates movement screening performance, demographic information, and injury history can accurately categorize risk of noncontact lower extremity (LE) injury. One hundred eighty-three collegiate athletes were screened during the preseason. The test scores and demographic information were entered into an injury prediction algorithm that weighted the evidence-based risk factors. Athletes were then prospectively followed for noncontact LE injury. Subsequent analysis collapsed the groupings into two risk categories: Low (normal and slight) and High (moderate and substantial). Using these groups and noncontact LE injuries, relative risk (RR), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. Forty-two subjects sustained a noncontact LE injury over the course of the study. Athletes identified as High Risk (n = 63) were at a greater risk of noncontact LE injury (27/63) during the season [RR: 3.4 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 6.0]. These results suggest that an injury prediction algorithm composed of performance on efficient, low-cost, field-ready tests can help identify individuals at elevated risk of noncontact LE injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehr et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Noncontact lower extremity injury (n=183). High Risk category (injury prediction algorithm) vs. Low Risk category was evaluated on Noncontact lower extremity injury (RR 3.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 6.0). Athletes identified as High Risk by an injury prediction algorithm had a greater risk of noncontact lower extremity injury during the season (RR 3.4; 95% CI 2.0 to 6.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: