Key result
Intravenous iloprost provided no additional benefit over conventional management for reducing pulmonary artery hypertension crisis in infants after congenital heart surgery (26.7% vs 16.6%; P=0.53).
Why the study?
Does intravenous iloprost improve pulmonary artery pressures and clinical outcomes in infants with pulmonary artery hypertension after congenital heart surgery?
RCT (n=27)
Does intravenous iloprost improve pulmonary artery pressures and clinical outcomes in infants with pulmonary artery hypertension after congenital heart surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 26.7% vs 16.6%
p-value: p=0.53
Intravenous iloprost provided no additional benefit over conventional management for reducing pulmonary artery pressures or PAH crises in infants after congenital heart surgery.
Should not yet change postoperative PAH management; leaves open iloprost efficacy pending randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of intravenous iloprost on pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) in infants undergoing congenital heart surgery. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, the study group (n = 15) received a continuous infusion of iloprost (2.0 ng/kg/min) that was delivered immediately after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and continued for 72 h postoperatively. Patients in the control group (n = 12) were managed conventionally. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative data, including systolic and mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressures, PA/systemic pressure ratio, lactate level, PAH crisis, ventilation time, reintubation and lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to assess PA pressures at 1 day, 7 days and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: No mortality occurred. PAH crisis occurred in 2 (16.6%) patients in the control group and 4 (26.7%) patients in the study group (P = 0.53). Postoperative PA pressures and PA/systemic pressure ratios were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). The durations of ICU (P = 0.40) and hospital (P = 0.98) stays were similar between the groups. Echocardiographic studies demonstrated a significant decrease in postoperative PA pressures in the control (P = 0.001) and study (P = 0.0001) groups. However, no significant change was observed between the groups (P > 0.05). The Tukey multiple comparison test showed a significant decrease in PA pressures at each follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous iloprost demonstrated no additional benefit over the conventional management of infants with PAH after repair of intracardiac defects. Clinicians may prefer other alternative agents in infants with a high risk of PAH crisis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onan et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary artery hypertension (n=27). Intravenous iloprost vs. Conventional management was evaluated on Pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) crisis (p=0.53). Intravenous iloprost provided no additional benefit over conventional management for reducing pulmonary artery hypertension crisis in infants after congenital heart surgery (26.7% vs 16.6%; P=0.53).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: