Key result
Intermittent and continuous blood flow restriction increased peak bar velocity by 12-17% during bench press exercise at lighter loads compared to no restriction.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction on bar velocity during the bench press exercise across different resistive loads.
Does continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction improve bar velocity during bench press exercise in strength-trained males?
RCT (n=11)
Open-label
Randomized crossover design
No
Does continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction improve bar velocity during bench press exercise in strength-trained males?
Blood flow restriction during bench press exercise acutely increases peak bar velocity at lower loads (20-50% 1RM) without impairing performance at higher loads.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute BFR velocity gains at low loads are preliminary; leaves open translation to chronic strength or clinical outcomes.
This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM ( p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion ( p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilk et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy strength-trained males (n=11). Blood flow restriction (intermittent or continuous) vs. No blood flow restriction was evaluated on Peak bar velocity at 20% 1RM (m/s) (Cohen's d 0.82, p=<0.0001). Intermittent and continuous blood flow restriction increased peak bar velocity by 12-17% during bench press exercise at lighter loads compared to no restriction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: