Key result
Vasovagal patients exhibited higher systolic blood pressure entropy at rest and a stronger reduction in RR-interval complexity after head-up tilt compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
Does the complexity of cardiovascular rhythms during a head-up tilt test differ between vasovagal patients and healthy controls?
Case-Control
Does the complexity of cardiovascular rhythms during a head-up tilt test differ between vasovagal patients and healthy controls?
Opposite switches in entropy between healthy controls and vasovagal patients during tilt testing suggest that baroreflex in VVS more strongly affects heart rate due to inefficient blood pressure regulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reflect autonomic dysregulation in vasovagal syncope; hypothesis-generating for entropy measures, requiring validation before any clinical role.
OBJECTIVE: The head-up tilt (HUT) test, which provokes transient dynamical alterations in the regulation of cardiovascular system, provides insights into complex organization of this system. Based on signals with heart period intervals (RR-intervals) and/or systolic blood pressure (SBP), differences in the cardiovascular regulation between vasovagal patients (VVS) and the healthy people group (CG) are investigated. APPROACH: Short-term relations among signal data represented symbolically by three-beat patterns allow to qualify and quantify the complexity of the cardiovascular regulation by Shannon entropy. Four types of patterns: permutation, ordinal, deterministic and dynamical, are used, and different resolutions of signal values in the the symbolization are applied in order to verify how entropy of patterns depends on a way in which values of signals are preprocessed. MAIN RESULTS: At rest, in the physiologically important signal resolution ranges, independently of the type of patterns used in estimates, the complexity of SBP signals in VVS is different from the complexity found in CG. Entropy of VVS is higher than CG what could be interpreted as substantial presence of noisy ingredients in SBP of VVS. After tilting this relation switches. Entropy of CG occurs significantly higher than VVS for SBP signals. In the case of RR-intervals and large resolutions, the complexity after the tilt becomes reduced when compared to the complexity of RR-intervals at rest for both groups. However, in the case of VVS patients this reduction is significantly stronger than in CG. SIGNIFICANCE: Our observations about opposite switches in entropy between CG and VVS might support a hypothesis that baroreflex in VVS affects stronger the heart rate because of the inefficient regulation (possibly impaired local vascular tone alternations) of the blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wejer et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Vasovagal syncope. Vasovagal syncope vs. Healthy people group was evaluated on Complexity of cardiovascular regulation by Shannon entropy of RR-intervals and systolic blood pressure. Vasovagal patients exhibited higher systolic blood pressure entropy at rest and a stronger reduction in RR-interval complexity after head-up tilt compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: