Why the study?
The study evaluated possible applications of entropy measures to analyze biosignals recorded during head up tilt testing in patients with suspected vasovagal syndrome.
Can entropy measures of biosignals during head up tilt testing differentiate between patients who develop syncope in the passive phase versus after provocation?
Can entropy measures of biosignals during head up tilt testing differentiate between patients who develop syncope in the passive phase versus after provocation?
Entropy measures, specifically Conditional Entropy of R-R intervals, may help predict the outcome of head-up tilt testing in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CE(RRI) > 0.7 may predict passive-phase HUTT positivity; hypothesis-generating for entropy measures in vasovagal syncope evaluation.
The paper presents possible applications of entropy measures in analysis of biosignals recorded during head up tilt testing (HUTT) in patients with suspected vasovagal syndrome. The study group comprised 80 patients who developed syncope during HUTT (57 in the passive phase of the test (HUTT(+) group) and 23 who had negative result of passive phase and developed syncope after provocation with nitroglycerine (HUTT(-) group)). The paper focuses on assessment of monitored signals' complexity (heart rate expressed as R-R intervals (RRI), blood pressure (sBP, dBP) and stroke volume (SV)) using various types of entropy measures (Sample Entropy (SE), Fuzzy Entropy (FE), Shannon Entropy (Sh), Conditional Entropy (CE), Permutation Entropy (PE)). Assessment of the complexity of signals in supine position indicated presence of significant differences between HUTT(+) versus HUTT(-) patients only for Conditional Entropy (CE(RRI)). Values of CE(RRI) higher than 0.7 indicate likelihood of a positive result of HUTT already at the passive phase. During tilting, in the pre-syncope phase, significant differences were found for: (SE(sBP), SE(dBP), FE(RRI), FE(sBP), FE(dBP), FE(SV), Sh(sBP), Sh(SV), CE(sBP), CE(dBP)). HUTT(+) patients demonstrated significant changes in signals' complexity more frequently than HUTT(-) patients. When comparing entropy measurements done in the supine position with those during tilting, SV assessed in HUTT(+) patients was the only parameter for which all tested measures of entropy (SE(SV), FE(SV), Sh(SV), CE(SV), PE(SV)) showed significant differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buszko et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: