Key result
Higher day-by-day home blood pressure variability in winter was significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease events (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.02-1.54 per 1-SD increase in SD SBP).
Why the study?
Although day-by-day home blood pressure variability has been linked to cardiovascular disease risk, whether this association varies by season remained unclear.
Does day-by-day home blood pressure variability measured in winter predict cardiovascular disease incidence more strongly than in other seasons in a predominantly hypertensive population?
Observational (n=4,231)
Yes
Does day-by-day home blood pressure variability measured in winter predict cardiovascular disease incidence more strongly than in other seasons in a predominantly hypertensive population?
Hazard Ratio: 1.26 (95% CI 1.02–1.54)
Day-by-day home blood pressure variability measured in winter is more strongly associated with future cardiovascular disease incidence than when measured in other seasons.
Winter home BPV may signal higher CVD risk warranting monitoring; leaves open whether season-adjusted thresholds improve prediction.
Background: Although day-by-day home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, it remains unclear whether this association differs from season to season. The present study aimed to assess seasonal variation in day-by-day home BP variability and its association with CVD risk. Methods: We analyzed the data from a nationwide, prospective observational study, the J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure), in which 14 consecutive days of home BP monitoring were conducted. The values of SD (SD systolic BP [SBP] ), coefficient of variation SBP , and average real variability SBP of home SBP were used as indices of day-by-day home BPV. Results: Among 4231 participants (mean age, 64.9±10.9 years, 46.7% male, 91.5% hypertensives), all 3 day-by-day home BPV indices were lower in summer than winter after adjusting for confounding factors. In winter, SD SBP , coefficient of variation SBP , and average real variability SBP were significantly associated with increased risk of CVD events (coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and aortic dissection; adjusted hazard ratio [95%CI] per 1-SD of SD SBP , 1.26 [1.02–1.54]; coefficient of variation SBP , 1.24 [1.02–1.52]; average real variability SBP , 1.44 [1.17–1.77]). These relationships were also observed in the analysis of quartiles of BPV parameters (adjusted hazard ratio [95%CI] compared to the first quartile, fourth quartile of SD SBP 2.26 [1.06–4.85]; coefficient of variation SBP 2.96 [1.43–6.15]; average real variability SBP 2.73 [1.25–5.93]). In other seasons, however, there were no significant associations between day-by-day home BPV and CVD event risk. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that day-by-day home BPV measured in winter is more strongly associated with future CVD incidence than that measured in other seasons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narita et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=4,231). Day-by-day home blood pressure variability in winter vs. Lower blood pressure variability / other seasons was evaluated on CVD events (coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and aortic dissection) (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.54). Higher day-by-day home blood pressure variability in winter was significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease events (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.02-1.54 per 1-SD increase in SD SBP).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: