Key result
The electrocardiogram-based rhythm irregularity burden strongly predicted incident atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source (HR 3.12; 95% CI 1.62-5.80; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Undetected AF remains an important cause of ESUS, but empiric oral anticoagulation failed in unselected patients and guidance on effective AF detection is lacking.
Does rhythm irregularity burden predict incident AF in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Cohort (n=297)
Yes
Does rhythm irregularity burden predict incident AF in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?
A novel ECG-based rhythm irregularity burden strongly predicts incident atrial fibrillation in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source, potentially guiding targeted AF detection strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide targeted AF monitoring in ESUS; leaves open whether score-guided anticoagulation reduces recurrent stroke.
Objective Approximately 20% of strokes are embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) remains an important cause. Yet, oral anticoagulation in unselected ESUS patients failed in secondary stroke prevention. Guidance on effective AF detection is lacking. Here, we introduce a novel, non‐invasive AF risk assessment after ESUS. Methods Catch‐Up ESUS is an investigator‐initiated, observational cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2019 at the Munich University Hospital. Besides clinical characteristics, patients received ≥72 h digital electrocardiogram recordings to generate the rhythm irregularity burden. Uni‐ and multivariable regression models predicted the primary endpoint of incident AF, ascertained by standardized follow‐up including implantable cardiac monitors. Predictors included the novel rhythm irregularity burden constructed from digital electrocardiogram recordings. We independently validated our model in ESUS patients from the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. Results A total of 297 ESUS patients were followed for 15.6 ± 7.6 months. Incident AF (46 patients, 15.4%) occurred after a median of 105 days (25th to 75th percentile 31–33 days). Secondary outcomes were recurrent stroke in 7.7% and death in 6.1%. Multivariable‐adjusted analyses identified the rhythm irregularity burden as the strongest AF‐predictor (hazard ratio 3.12, 95% confidence interval 1.62–5.80, p < 0001) while accounting for the known risk factors age, CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc‐Score, and NT‐proBNP. Independent validation confirmed the rhythm irregularity burden as the most significant AF‐predictor (hazard ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.45–3.33, p < 0001). Interpretation The novel, non‐invasive, electrocardiogram‐based rhythm irregularity burden may help adjudicating AF risk after ESUS, and subsequently guide AF‐detection after ESUS. Clinical trials need to clarify if high‐AF risk patients benefit from tailored secondary stroke prevention. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:479–488
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falkenhausen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) (n=297). Rhythm irregularity burden from digital electrocardiogram recordings was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.62-5.80, p=<0.001). The electrocardiogram-based rhythm irregularity burden strongly predicted incident atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source (HR 3.12; 95% CI 1.62-5.80; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: