Key result
The CNAP2GO continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement system demonstrated a mean difference of -1.0 ± 7.0 mmHg compared to invasive arterial catheter measurements in patients having surgery.
Why the study?
Current wearable continuous BP methods analyzing time components lack clinical accuracy, while direct BP measurement technologies are too bulky.
Does CNAP2GO accurately measure mean arterial pressure compared to invasive arterial catheters in patients having surgery?
Observational (n=46)
No
Does CNAP2GO accurately measure mean arterial pressure compared to invasive arterial catheters in patients having surgery?
The CNAP2GO volume control technique provides continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring with acceptable clinical accuracy compared to invasive measurements, demonstrating potential for future miniaturized wearable sensors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable compact continuous BP monitoring; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
A bstract Wearable sensors to continuously measure blood pressure (BP) and derived cardiovascular variables have the potential to revolutionize patient monitoring. Current wearable methods analyzing time components (e.g., pulse transit time) still lack clinical accuracy, whereas existing technologies for direct BP measurement are too bulky. Here we present a new art of continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (CNAP2GO). It directly measures BP by using a new “volume control technique” and could be used for small wearable sensors integrated in a finger ring. As a software prototype, CNAP2GO showed excellent BP measurement performance in comparison with invasive BP in 46 patients having surgery. The resulting pulsatile BP signal carries information to derive cardiac output and other hemodynamic variables. We show that CNAP2GO can be miniaturized for wearable approaches. CNAP2GO potentially constitutes the breakthrough for wearable sensors for blood pressure and flow monitoring in both ambulatory and in-hospital clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortin et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing neurosurgery with general anesthesia (n=46). CNAP2GO continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement vs. Invasive radial arterial catheter was evaluated on Agreement of mean arterial pressure (mBP) measurements (Mean difference -1.0 ± 7.0 mmHg, 95% CI -14.8 to 12.7). The CNAP2GO continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement system demonstrated a mean difference of -1.0 ± 7.0 mmHg compared to invasive arterial catheter measurements in patients having surgery.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: