Key result
Oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the finger distal phalanx provided the most consistent mean blood pressure compared to upper-arm measurements among 20 young adults.
Why the study?
Upper-arm oscillometric blood pressure monitors are inconvenient for ambulatory monitoring, but the reliability of alternative finger-worn devices remains questioned.
Does oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the finger distal phalanx provide consistent mean blood pressure readings compared to upper-arm measurement in young adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
Does oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the finger distal phalanx provide consistent mean blood pressure readings compared to upper-arm measurement in young adults?
Fingertip oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the distal phalanx is a feasible and consistent alternative to upper-arm measurement for mean blood pressure in young adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finger oscillometry shows promise for consistent BP readings; leaves open validation and clinical adoption in broader populations.
The most commonly used oscillometric upper-arm (UA) blood pressure (BP) monitors are not convenient enough for ambulatory BP monitoring, given the large size of the arm cuff and the compression of UA during the measurement. Finger-worn oscillometric BP devices featuring miniaturized finger cuff have been developed and researched as an alternative solution to the UA-based measurement, yet the reliability of the finger-based measurement is still questioned. To investigate the feasibility of oscillometric BP measurements at the finger position, we performed model-based analysis and experimental validation to explore the underlying issues associated with extending the cuff-based oscillometric approach from UA to other alternative sites. The simulation results revealed that a larger bone-to-tissue volume ratio produced a lower pressure transmission efficiency, which can account for the inter-site measurement discrepancies of mean blood pressure (MBP). We also experimentally compared the oscillometric MBP measurements at UA, middle forearm, wrist, finger proximal phalanx, and finger distal phalanx (FD) of 20 young adults, and each position was matched with a cuff of appropriate size and kept at the same height with the heart. The experimental results demonstrated that FD could be a superior alternative position for oscillometric BP measurement, as it requires the smallest cuff size while providing the most consistent MBP with the UA. Our analysis also suggested that further study is demanded to identify the appropriate oscillometric algorithm for reliable systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure measurements at FD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) reported a cross-sectional. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement at finger distal phalanx (FD) vs. Upper-arm (UA) oscillometric measurement was evaluated on Consistency of mean blood pressure (MBP) with upper-arm measurement. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the finger distal phalanx provided the most consistent mean blood pressure compared to upper-arm measurements among 20 young adults.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: